From the painting critic Li Kaixian, writing in 1545:
Jiang Zicheng's painting is "like an Indian monk, his entire body clothed in precious objects, yet giving off a putrid odor."
Lin Liang is "like the sticks on a woodgatherer's back or the dried wood at the bottom of a stream - carpenters wouldn't even look at it."
Guo Xu "is like an old Confucian trying to learn farming: his strength is not equal to his fellows' and he grows more weeds than grain."
Wang E "is like an official of the Five Dynasties: his hat is of black silk but his person is that of a butcher."
Bonus, from He Liangjun, writing about twenty-five years later: "As for the likes of... Zhang Lu of the North, I would be ashamed to wipe my table with his paintings."
H/T: Richard Barnhart, "The 'Wild and Heterodox' School of Ming Painting," in Susan Bush and Christian Murck, eds., Theories of the Arts in China, Princeton University Press, 1983.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

3 comments:
Ha!
Much more to the point than some of those quasi intellectual attempts to discredit.
this is fantastic. sounds like they had TV writers' rooms back in the Ming dynasty: "can you BELIEVE that guy is still emperor?"
Post a Comment